H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-0
Elina Svitolina holds a 1–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elina Svitolina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2015 Bogota quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2015* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Elina Svitolina | 6-3 7-5 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elina Svitolina | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |