H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Elina Svitolina holds a 2–1 lead over Nicole Gibbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elina Svitolina leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Gibbs won the 2017 Hong Kong Open second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Gibbs | (w/o) | Elina Svitolina | Match data | Oct 13, 2017* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Elina Svitolina | 6-3 7-6(5) | Nicole Gibbs | Match data | Aug 7, 2015* | R16 | Bank of the West Classic | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Elina Svitolina | 7-6(3) 7-6(6) | Nicole Gibbs | Match data | Jan 22, 2015* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #9 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,135 | 449 | 233 | 65.8% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 20 |
| Nicole Gibbs | #175 | #68 | 946 | 1,690 | 33 | 59 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #109 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,965 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #123 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #15 | 1,919 | 0 | 16 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,778 | 0 | 16 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,890 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,981 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #9 | 2,084 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2012 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 25 | 18 | 43 | 58.1% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 36 | 16 | 52 | 69.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 32 | 11 | 43 | 74.4% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 33 | 10 | 43 | 76.7% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 33 | 16 | 49 | 67.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 31 | 13 | 44 | 70.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 27 | 8 | 35 | 77.1% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 299 | 155 | 454 | 65.9% | 116 | 51 | 167 | 69.5% | 32 | 26 | 58 | 55.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | 31 | 47 | 78 | 39.7% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/683 of Elina Svitolina's and 83/94 of Nicole Gibbs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2012 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 52.0% | 58.6% | 39.9% | 33.1% | 30.0% | 49.1% | 33.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 28/32 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 58.0% | 60.4% | 42.9% | 57.0% | 45.7% | 53.0% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 56/60 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 63.9% | 64.3% | 44.4% | 48.5% | 49.8% | 57.2% | 44.3% | 2012 | 6/6 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 56.5% | 54.1% | 41.4% | 46.9% | 35.9% | 48.3% | 39.5% |
| 20 | 2015 | 51/64 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 63.7% | 63.7% | 48.2% | 43.8% | 49.8% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 2013 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 57.4% | 53.7% | 40.6% | 46.8% | 39.6% | 48.2% | 45.0% |
| 21 | 2016 | 50/63 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 62.6% | 64.8% | 45.9% | 49.9% | 51.7% | 57.7% | 45.7% | 2014 | 9/11 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 55.4% | 61.2% | 46.0% | 53.0% | 53.3% | 54.7% | 37.3% |
| 22 | 2017 | 60/65 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 59.9% | 68.3% | 49.2% | 57.8% | 50.7% | 60.6% | 49.0% | 2015 | 11/15 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 55.5% | 58.8% | 49.3% | 51.0% | 46.2% | 54.6% | 43.3% |
| 23 | 2018 | 54/59 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 62.4% | 68.3% | 50.0% | 48.9% | 48.5% | 61.2% | 46.4% | 2016 | 25/29 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 61.3% | 63.6% | 43.8% | 50.2% | 48.1% | 55.9% | 44.7% |
| 24 | 2019 | 56/62 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 60.0% | 66.9% | 44.9% | 53.6% | 49.3% | 58.3% | 45.4% | 2017 | 18/19 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 60.2% | 58.8% | 42.9% | 52.5% | 38.7% | 52.3% | 40.6% |
| 25 | 2020 | 27/27 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 60.8% | 65.5% | 45.9% | 57.9% | 41.9% | 57.9% | 44.6% | 2018 | 7/7 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 59.6% | 59.6% | 41.8% | 40.3% | 37.7% | 52.4% | 35.7% |
| 26 | 2021 | 53/59 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 59.9% | 67.8% | 48.8% | 58.9% | 48.2% | 60.3% | 45.3% | 2019 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 59.6% | 56.6% | 40.1% | 59.7% | 34.7% | 50.1% | 44.6% |
| 27 | 2022 | 12/13 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 61.3% | 63.3% | 45.9% | 55.7% | 45.9% | 56.3% | 43.7% | 2020 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 60.4% | 70.3% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 40.0% | 62.3% | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2023 | 26/27 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 62.6% | 65.2% | 46.0% | 51.2% | 51.6% | 57.9% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 43/46 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 61.2% | 66.8% | 47.1% | 53.4% | 47.2% | 59.1% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 34/47 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 57.3% | 68.3% | 48.0% | 58.6% | 51.7% | 59.1% | 46.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 49/56 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 60.8% | 68.5% | 47.5% | 61.6% | 52.2% | 60.3% | 48.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 602/683 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 61.1% | 66.2% | 47.0% | 53.6% | 49.2% | 58.7% | 45.7% | — | 83/94 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 58.9% | 60.1% | 44.0% | 50.4% | 43.7% | 53.6% | 41.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2012 | 1466 | 100.5 | -1.44 | -1.31 | 0.658 | 41.7% | +21 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.17 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 1561 | 121.0 | -1.24 | +0.27 | 0.948 | 48.9% | -7 | +4 | — | 41.7% | -0.57 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 1791 | 137.5 | +0.84 | +1.00 | 1.036 | 50.8% | 0 | -193 | -198 | 56.1% | +0.29 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | +0.54 | 2012 | 1505 | 109.0 | -2.02 | +0.08 | 0.764 | 44.2% | +11 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.35 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1790 | 147.4 | +0.25 | +3.27 | 1.062 | 51.2% | +14 | -22 | -205 | 59.4% | +0.57 | 12–7 (63%) | 11–4 (73%) | — | +0.39 | 2013 | 1509 | 106.7 | -1.19 | -0.03 | 0.868 | 46.6% | +9 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.09 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1895 | 148.6 | +1.89 | +2.98 | 1.080 | 51.6% | +19 | -120 | -343 | 60.0% | +0.75 | 16–8 (67%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | -0.32 | 2014 | 1547 | 108.6 | -2.13 | -2.66 | 0.824 | 46.3% | +25 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.93 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1988 | 154.8 | +4.04 | +5.60 | 1.245 | 54.7% | +9 | -29 | -359 | 73.1% | +1.55 | 13–8 (62%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | +0.07 | 2015 | 1504 | 106.2 | -2.08 | +0.98 | 0.955 | 49.1% | +51 | -19 | — | 30.3% | -1.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | +0.39 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1994 | 158.3 | +4.84 | +3.77 | 1.197 | 53.6% | +22 | -2 | -341 | 68.2% | +1.32 | 12–6 (67%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.02 | 2016 | 1579 | 124.9 | -0.86 | +1.29 | 1.013 | 50.2% | +27 | -135 | — | 45.8% | -0.20 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1965 | 159.8 | +2.26 | +3.05 | 1.088 | 51.8% | +28 | -22 | -241 | 60.9% | +0.78 | 10–9 (53%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.58 | 2017 | 1546 | 114.2 | -2.54 | -1.06 | 0.851 | 46.5% | +3 | — | — | 37.2% | -1.12 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.04 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1929 | 129.5 | +1.04 | +1.65 | 1.059 | 51.2% | -34 | +74 | — | 65.5% | +0.48 | 4–0 (100%) | 5–0 (100%) | — | +0.90 | 2018 | 1513 | 110.7 | +0.08 | -2.80 | 0.750 | 44.4% | +14 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.28 |
| 26 | 2021 | 1920 | 154.9 | +4.17 | +3.12 | 1.141 | 52.7% | +24 | +84 | -218 | 61.4% | +0.70 | 14–10 (58%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | -0.37 | 2019 | 1579 | 116.8 | +0.94 | +1.74 | 0.894 | 47.3% | +1 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.37 |
| 27 | 2022 | 1778 | 119.9 | -0.55 | -0.61 | 0.999 | 49.9% | +11 | — | — | 43.3% | -0.13 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +1.08 | 2020 | 1573 | 109.7 | -1.74 | +0.55 | 0.883 | 48.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1890 | 139.8 | +2.32 | +1.33 | 1.059 | 51.2% | -58 | +95 | -76 | 59.7% | +0.42 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | -1.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 1912 | 155.0 | +2.59 | +2.04 | 1.092 | 52.2% | -17 | +33 | +19 | 62.3% | +0.92 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1982 | 164.1 | +1.92 | +3.74 | 1.139 | 53.0% | -10 | +105 | -34 | 67.0% | +1.34 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 2084 | 166.4 | +3.58 | +5.15 | 1.213 | 54.3% | +20 | +75 | -165 | 68.5% | +1.46 | 15–3 (83%) | 10–4 (71%) | — | -0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2136 | 157.6 | +2.33 | +2.97 | 1.107 | 52.2% | +10 | +12 | -185 | 61.9% | +0.81 | 133–82 (62%) | 94–74 (56%) | 108.8 | -0.25 | — | 1690 | 120.8 | -1.49 | -0.16 | 0.895 | 47.6% | +20 | -69 | — | 38.2% | -0.92 | 10–17 (37%) | 5–8 (38%) | 92.7 | +1.11 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | 8 | 6 | 14 | Aug 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 2021 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 7 | 11 | Apr 24, 2021 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 6 | 4 | 10 | Sep 7, 2021 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 3 | 6 | 9 | Feb 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 13, 2017 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 2017 | H2H |
| Heather Watson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 16, 2016 | H2H |