H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Donna Vekic H2H: 1-0
Elisabetta Cocciaretto holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elisabetta Cocciaretto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elisabetta Cocciaretto won the 2020 Palermo fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 25
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 0-6 6-3 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2020* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 6-2 6-4 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | #68 | #29 | 1,420 | 1,843 | 79 | 90 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #68 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |