H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Magda Linette H2H: 0-3
Magda Linette holds a 3–0 lead over Elisabetta Cocciaretto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2026 Auckland fourth round 7-5 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 25
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Magda Linette | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2025 | Mérida | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-4 6-0 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Magda Linette | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | #68 | #29 | 1,420 | 1,843 | 79 | 90 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #68 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |