H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 4-0
Elise Burgin holds a 4–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1987 Tampa third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1987* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elise Burgin | 6-0 6-1 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1986* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Elise Burgin | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 6-0 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1984* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elise Burgin | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |