H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-4
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 4–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1992 Toronto second round 6-2 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1992 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-6 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elise Burgin | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |