H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Elly Hakami H2H: 1-0
Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Elly Hakami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Elly Hakami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Elly Hakami | #862 | #32 | 26 | 1,809 | 43 | 55 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Elly Hakami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #117 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #69 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #270 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,507 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |