H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Elna Reinach H2H: 2-1
Elise Burgin holds a 2–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1991 Oklahoma third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1991* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-2 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| May 16, 1990* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elise Burgin | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 6-1 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |