H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elise Burgin vs Grace Kim H2H: 2-0

Elise Burgin holds a 2–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1985 Manhattan Beach round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elise Burgin 6-1 6-2 Grace Kim Match data Jul 26, 1985* R32 Manhattan Beach Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Elise Burgin 6-4 5-7 6-2 Grace Kim Match data Mar 8, 1985* R16 Indianapolis 1 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elise Burgin Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elise Burgin Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elise Burgin Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1981 1509 111.3 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.26 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17
20 1982 1584 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1983 1743 128.0 — — — — +6 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1716 125.3 — — — — -22 — -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 1776 142.7 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1987 1703 130.2 — — — — -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1988 1629 115.8 — — — — +13 — +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 1701 132.4 — — — — -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 1528 99.7 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — 0 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1496 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1846 134.3 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91 — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.