H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-2
Kathy Horvath holds a 2–1 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1987 Strasbourg quarterfinal 2-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1987* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1985* | Indianapolis 1 | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1983* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elise Burgin | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |