H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-3
Larisa Savchenko holds a 3–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1989 Roland Garros second round 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Larisa Savchenko | 7-5 7-6(5) | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1988* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elise Burgin | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |