H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-1
Elise Burgin holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1990 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-3 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1986* | Charleston | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Elise Burgin | 7-5 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1984* | Fort Lauderdale | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |