H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elise Burgin vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 1-0

Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1982 US Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elise Burgin

USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H

1 – 0

1 main-draw meetings

Leigh Anne Thompson

USA Age 62

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Elise Burgin	6-3 6-3	Leigh Anne Thompson	Match data	Sep 3, 1982*	R64	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Elise Burgin	#768	#27	20	1,845	132	165	44.4%	0	0	0	1	0	1
Leigh Anne Thompson	—	—	—	1,792	42	73	36.5%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Elise Burgin							Leigh Anne Thompson
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	4–5	44.4%	—	1,542	0	0
18	1980	0–2	0.0%	—	1,475	0	0	1982	20–23	46.5%	—	1,765	0	1
19	1981	2–3	40.0%	—	1,509	0	0	1983	7–17	29.2%	—	1,715	0	1
20	1982	7–10	41.2%	—	1,584	0	0	1984	0–8	0.0%	—	1,589	0	1
21	1983	13–9	59.1%	—	1,743	0	0	1985	6–11	35.3%	—	1,594	0	1
22	1984	9–15	37.5%	#51	1,715	0	0	1986	5–9	35.7%	—	1,555	0	1
23	1985	29–23	55.8%	#52	1,772	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1986	25–22	53.2%	#40	1,775	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1987	17–21	44.7%	#66	1,703	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1988	5–12	29.4%	#108	1,629	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1989	16–19	45.7%	#62	1,700	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1990	7–19	26.9%	#149	1,569	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1991	0–3	0.0%	#299	1,527	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1992	2–5	28.6%	#166	1,523	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1993	0–2	0.0%	#400	1,496	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Elise Burgin																	Leigh Anne Thompson
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	2	2	4	50.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
18	1980	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	7	2	9	77.8%	7	8	15	46.7%	0	4	4	0.0%	6	9	15	40.0%
19	1981	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	1	4	5	20.0%	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	4	8	12	33.3%
20	1982	6	6	12	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1984	0	5	5	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1983	10	4	14	71.4%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1985	6	9	15	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
22	1984	3	6	9	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1986	0	3	3	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	3	4	7	42.9%
23	1985	11	8	19	57.9%	8	6	14	57.1%	9	6	15	60.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1986	10	7	17	58.8%	10	5	15	66.7%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	7	10	30.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1987	4	6	10	40.0%	4	5	9	44.4%	8	5	13	61.5%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1988	5	7	12	41.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1989	9	11	20	45.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1990	5	12	17	29.4%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1991	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1992	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1993	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	64	77	141	45.4%	34	30	64	53.1%	26	34	60	43.3%	8	24	32	25.0%	—	16	25	41	39.0%	13	20	33	39.4%	0	5	5	0.0%	13	22	35	37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Elise Burgin																Leigh Anne Thompson
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	1543	110.4	—	—	—	—	+61	+27	—	47.6%	0.00	1–2 (33%)	1–1	—	+0.41
18	1980	1476	93.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	—	—	+0.20	1982	1765	135.1	—	—	—	—	+1	-160	-227	45.7%	-0.04	5–5 (50%)	2–5 (29%)	100.7	-0.61
19	1981	1509	111.3	—	—	—	—	+69	—	—	45.5%	-0.64	0–1	—	—	-0.26	1983	1715	134.4	—	—	—	—	+4	-84	—	38.8%	-0.96	0–5 (0%)	1–1	—	-2.18
20	1982	1584	111.4	—	—	—	—	+15	—	—	37.8%	-1.19	3–2 (60%)	4–1 (80%)	105.6	-0.34	1984	1590	92.8	—	—	—	—	+12	-27	—	11.1%	-2.33	0–2	1–2 (33%)	—	-0.15
21	1983	1743	128.0	—	—	—	—	+6	—	-177	54.0%	+0.10	5–1 (83%)	2–0	—	-0.95	1985	1594	115.3	—	—	—	—	+21	—	—	36.8%	-0.66	2–4 (33%)	2–1 (67%)	—	+0.16
22	1984	1716	125.3	—	—	—	—	-22	—	-103	37.5%	-0.88	5–3 (63%)	4–1 (80%)	105.2	-2.38	1986	1556	101.1	—	—	—	—	-8	-18	—	43.8%	-0.53	2–4 (33%)	2–3 (40%)	95.1	+1.93
23	1985	1773	137.6	—	—	—	—	-63	-51	-73	51.7%	+0.03	11–5 (69%)	6–8 (43%)	106.3	-1.48	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1986	1776	142.7	—	—	—	—	-21	+19	-104	53.2%	+0.25	7–8 (47%)	4–4 (50%)	98.8	-2.16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1987	1703	130.2	—	—	—	—	-19	+39	+12	45.2%	-0.32	4–6 (40%)	5–4 (56%)	98.4	-1.73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1988	1629	115.8	—	—	—	—	+13	—	+21	33.3%	-1.18	2–5 (29%)	2–3 (40%)	95.2	-0.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1989	1701	132.4	—	—	—	—	-21	+34	-81	47.6%	-0.30	5–7 (42%)	1–3 (25%)	96.1	-1.05	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1990	1569	112.5	—	—	—	—	-10	+144	+32	32.8%	-1.49	5–6 (45%)	4–4 (50%)	97.2	-1.68	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1991	1528	99.7	—	—	—	—	-19	—	—	0.0%	-2.50	—	—	—	+0.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1992	1524	109.4	—	—	—	—	0	+174	—	37.5%	-1.50	0–2	—	—	+0.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1993	1496	97.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-3.00	0–1	—	—	+0.02	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1846	134.3	—	—	—	—	-16	+27	-61	44.7%	-0.47	47–47 (50%)	32–28 (53%)	102.8	-3.91	—	1793	126.6	—	—	—	—	+9	-96	-227	40.5%	-0.53	10–22 (31%)	9–13 (41%)	89.9	-0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Elise Burgin's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Zina Garrison	1	6	7	Apr 17, 1992	H2H
Terry Phelps	1	6	7	Jan 4, 1990	H2H
Lori Mcneil	2	5	7	Aug 30, 1989	H2H
Bettina Bunge	2	5	7	Mar 19, 1987	H2H
Helena Sukova	0	6	6	Nov 3, 1988	H2H

Leigh Anne Thompson's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	1	2	3	Apr 29, 1986	H2H
Marcella Mesker	1	2	3	Feb 28, 1986	H2H
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan	1	2	3	Sep 2, 1985	H2H
Sandy Collins	2	1	3	Aug 29, 1985	H2H
Joanne Russell	1	2	3	Mar 7, 1985	H2H