H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Maria Lindstrom H2H: 1-0
Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Lindstrom in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1986 Dallas second round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Elise Burgin | 6-0 6-4 | Maria Lindstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Maria Lindstrom | — | — | — | 1,616 | 38 | 66 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Maria Lindstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |