H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elise Burgin vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-2

Pam Casale holds a 2–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1986 Houston round of 16 6-2 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale #55 6-2 4-6 6-4 Elise Burgin #27 Match data May 9, 1986* R16 Houston WTA 250 Clay
Pam Casale 6-1 2-6 6-1 Elise Burgin Match data Apr 18, 1985* R32 Amelia Island Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elise Burgin Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elise Burgin Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elise Burgin Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1981 1509 111.3 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.26 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1982 1584 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1983 1743 128.0 — — — — +6 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.95 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1984 1716 125.3 — — — — -22 — -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1986 1776 142.7 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1987 1703 130.2 — — — — -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1988 1629 115.8 — — — — +13 — +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1989 1701 132.4 — — — — -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 1528 99.7 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — 0 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1496 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1846 134.3 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.