H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-0
Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1983 Manhattan Beach second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1983* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-4 6-0 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |