H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Elise Burgin vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-1

Elise Burgin and Sandra Cecchini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay, while Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1987 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #90 6-2 6-2 Elise Burgin #42 Match data Apr 15, 1987* R64 Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay
Elise Burgin #67 6-2 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #42 Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elise Burgin Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elise Burgin Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elise Burgin Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1981 1509 111.3 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.26 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1982 1584 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1983 1743 128.0 — — — — +6 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.95 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1984 1716 125.3 — — — — -22 — -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1986 1776 142.7 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1987 1703 130.2 — — — — -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1988 1629 115.8 — — — — +13 — +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1989 1701 132.4 — — — — -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1991 1528 99.7 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — 0 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 1993 1496 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1846 134.3 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.