H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Elise Burgin vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0

Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1987 San Diego round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elise Burgin #47 6-2 6-4 Tina Mochizuki Match data Aug 5, 1987* R64 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elise Burgin Tina Mochizuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0
18 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0
19 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0
20 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0
21 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
26 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0
28 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1
29 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1
30 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1
31 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elise Burgin Tina Mochizuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0% — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elise Burgin Tina Mochizuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38
18 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
19 1981 1509 111.3 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.26 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65
20 1982 1584 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
21 1983 1743 128.0 — — — — +6 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.95 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 1984 1716 125.3 — — — — -22 — -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 1776 142.7 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1987 1703 130.2 — — — — -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
26 1988 1629 115.8 — — — — +13 — +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 1701 132.4 — — — — -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
28 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
29 1991 1528 99.7 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68
30 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — 0 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
31 1993 1496 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career — 1846 134.3 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91 — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.