H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emiko Okagawa vs Julie Harrington H2H: 1-2

Julie Harrington holds a 2–1 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Harrington leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1982 Tokyo Borden round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Julie Harrington
USA Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emiko Okagawa 4-6 6-3 6-0 Julie Harrington Match data Oct 14, 1982* R32 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard
Julie Harrington 6-4 6-3 Emiko Okagawa Match data Oct 22, 1981* R32 Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 Hard
Julie Harrington 6-3 6-3 Emiko Okagawa Match data Oct 23, 1980* R32 Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Harrington #175 #70 — 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiko Okagawa Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,523 0 0
18 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0 1980 12–17 41.4% — 1,602 0 0
19 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,724 0 0
20 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,589 0 0
21 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0
22 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0
23 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiko Okagawa Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
20 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5%
21 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiko Okagawa Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03 1979 1524 114.6 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.68
18 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41 1980 1602 125.8 — — — — -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75 1981 1725 127.6 — — — — +24 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 1982 1589 116.4 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86
21 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89 1983 1629 115.5 — — — — +33 -32 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14 1984 1571 105.9 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.33
23 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25 — 1741 124.4 — — — — +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.