H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emiko Okagawa vs Julie Harrington H2H: 1-2
Julie Harrington holds a 2–1 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Harrington leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1982 Tokyo Borden third round 4-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1982* | Tokyo Borden | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Emiko Okagawa | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Julie Harrington | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1981* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Harrington | 6-4 6-3 | Emiko Okagawa | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1980* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Harrington | 6-3 6-3 | Emiko Okagawa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Harrington | #175 | #70 | — | 1,742 | 55 | 80 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Julie Harrington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–19 | 24.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #175 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |