H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Emiliana Arango vs Ana Bogdan
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Emiliana Arango vs Ana Bogdan.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 25
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiliana Arango | #96 | #46 | 1,229 | 1,700 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiliana Arango | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #825 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #502 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #405 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #116 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #169 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #49 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |