H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 0-1
Galina Voskoboeva holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galina Voskoboeva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Galina Voskoboeva won the 2008 Palermo third round 4-6 6-3 0-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Galina Voskoboeva | 4-6 6-3 0-1 (ret.) | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Galina Voskoboeva | #1,417 | #42 | 1,284 | 1,701 | 70 | 120 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilie Loit | Galina Voskoboeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #140 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #113 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #114 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #58 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #259 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #421 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |