H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Mashona Washington H2H: 1-1

Emilie Loit and Mashona Washington are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay, while Mashona Washington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mashona Washington won the 2006 Hobart International round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mashona Washington
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mashona Washington #76 6-3 6-3 Emilie Loit #74 Match data Jan 12, 2006* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Emilie Loit #42 6-4 6-4 Mashona Washington #168 Match data Mar 5, 2004* R16 Acapulco Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mashona Washington #990 #50 676 1,645 42 76 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Mashona Washington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #407 1,499 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #165 1,493 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 1999 4–5 44.4% #130 1,506 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2000 3–9 25.0% #142 1,481 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 2001 1–2 33.3% #134 1,489 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 2002 1–5 16.7% #109 1,470 0 0
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2003 1–5 16.7% #199 1,441 0 0
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 2004 13–12 52.0% #53 1,581 0 0
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 2005 13–22 37.1% #73 1,586 0 0
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 2006 5–10 33.3% #230 1,578 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #309 1,562 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #364 1,538 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Mashona Washington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 11 10 21 52.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 5 14 19 26.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 28 52 80 35.0% 4 12 16 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 22/77 of Mashona Washington's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Mashona Washington
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% 2004 1/25 4.0 4.0 55.1% 68.4% 29.0% 40.0% 30.8% 50.7% 44.2%
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% 2005 9/35 3.2 4.0 67.6% 61.3% 43.0% 56.0% 38.2% 55.4% 42.4%
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% 2006 10/15 2.5 4.5 64.9% 60.7% 46.9% 46.0% 36.0% 55.6% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.5% 55.0% 36.4% 50.0% 40.0% 48.4% 35.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 57.7% 53.1% 54.5% 60.0% 56.3% 39.8%
Career — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% — 22/118 2.8 4.1 65.7% 60.9% 44.3% 50.4% 37.9% 55.0% 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Mashona Washington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1994 1500 110.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.19
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 1998 1494 104.5 — — — — +27 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 1–1 — +0.08
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 1999 1506 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 47.4% -0.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.76
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 2000 1481 104.4 — — — — +34 — — 26.9% -2.00 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.23
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 2001 1489 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — -0.08
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 2002 1470 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–1 1–1 — -0.30
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2003 1441 96.8 — — — — +23 — — 26.7% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 2004 1581 124.4 -0.46 +0.14 0.897 47.0% -15 — — 51.8% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +0.41
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 2005 1586 116.5 +0.23 -0.86 0.949 48.9% -73 -83 +76 37.8% -0.89 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.0 -0.35
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 2006 1579 111.3 +0.23 -2.15 0.876 47.1% -56 -69 +67 38.9% -1.14 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1563 98.4 -1.32 -4.37 0.692 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1539 98.5 -1.16 -3.20 0.911 48.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.25
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1646 117.0 +0.07 -1.67 0.899 47.7% -13 -78 +74 38.5% -0.92 14–20 (41%) 15–9 (63%) 104.1 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.