H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 0-3
Leylah Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Emma Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leylah Fernandez leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leylah Fernandez won the 2025 Doha third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2025 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-2 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-2 6-3 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2023 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-2 6-4 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |