H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 2-2
Emma Navarro and Magdalena Frech are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2024 Wuhan third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2024* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-7(3) 6-0 6-2 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2024* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-3 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(10) 1-6 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |