H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Naomi Osaka H2H: 2-0
Emma Navarro holds a 2–0 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emma Navarro leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Emma Navarro won the 2025 Bad Homburg fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2025 | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Emma Navarro | 6-4 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Emma Navarro | 6-4 6-1 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 |