H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Paula Badosa H2H: 2-2
Emma Navarro and Paula Badosa are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emma Navarro won the 2026 Wimbledon first round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Emma Navarro | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Berlin | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Paula Badosa | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-2 7-5 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| May 10, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Paula Badosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 |