Emma Raducanu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Amanda Anisimova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2025 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 25, 2025 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 22, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Emma Raducanu vs Anna-Lena Friedsam H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a 1–0 lead over Emma Raducanu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2022 Portoroz round of 16 7-5 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 7-5 0-6 6-3 | Emma Raducanu | Match data | Sep 16, 2022* | R16 | Portoroz | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | #70 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,949 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #253 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,743 | 62 | 83 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,724 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,752 | 1 | 1 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,830 | 1 | 1 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2021 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2024 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 49 | 106 | 53.8% | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 36 | 43 | 79 | 45.6% | 18 | 28 | 46 | 39.1% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/164 of Emma Raducanu's and 128/144 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2021 | 18/18 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 68.5% | 69.9% | 43.1% | 58.9% | 38.2% | 61.2% | 45.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 34/34 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 67.8% | 63.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 53.1% | 58.1% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 10/11 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 62.8% | 65.7% | 49.3% | 53.4% | 33.3% | 59.2% | 41.0% | 2014 | 17/17 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 59.9% | 64.7% | 46.0% | 49.9% | 55.8% | 56.9% | 42.6% |
| 21 | 2024 | 31/32 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 64.5% | 63.7% | 46.5% | 63.3% | 51.1% | 57.7% | 45.4% | 2015 | 13/25 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 62.7% | 64.0% | 48.7% | 45.1% | 40.6% | 58.1% | 40.1% |
| 22 | 2025 | 39/48 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 65.8% | 65.3% | 47.0% | 58.2% | 51.8% | 59.1% | 45.6% | 2016 | 29/29 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 64.0% | 66.8% | 48.7% | 55.2% | 47.6% | 60.2% | 38.8% |
| 23 | 2026 | 18/21 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 66.5% | 62.4% | 48.1% | 51.6% | 59.7% | 58.2% | 49.0% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 66.2% | 51.0% | 50.0% | 61.5% | 66.7% | 50.6% | 39.1% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 67.6% | 52.3% | 49.5% | 65.9% | 60.0% | 52.0% | 37.7% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 67.0% | 62.6% | 46.2% | 56.0% | 50.1% | 56.9% | 39.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9/9 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 69.6% | 67.9% | 51.0% | 45.4% | 37.7% | 62.7% | 43.3% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14/16 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 64.3% | 63.5% | 43.8% | 55.2% | 37.7% | 56.5% | 39.4% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5/7 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 66.0% | 62.0% | 45.6% | 57.1% | 64.1% | 56.3% | 41.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 21/21 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 66.8% | 62.2% | 45.3% | 54.4% | 54.5% | 56.6% | 42.0% |
| Career | — | 150/163 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 66.2% | 64.7% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 50.1% | 58.7% | 45.5% | — | 128/145 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 64.8% | 64.0% | 47.0% | 53.1% | 48.7% | 57.9% | 40.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1725 | 136.6 | +2.85 | +1.24 | 1.176 | 53.0% | -9 | — | -66 | 69.4% | +1.25 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 1733 | 139.2 | +0.89 | +1.65 | 1.068 | 51.5% | -16 | -140 | -90 | 54.3% | +0.66 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.0 | +0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 1752 | 128.8 | +1.74 | -0.36 | 1.004 | 49.6% | +1 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.05 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.50 | 2014 | 1539 | 113.8 | +0.51 | -1.51 | 0.986 | 49.8% | +15 | 0 | — | 43.9% | -0.29 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.5 | -0.25 |
| 21 | 2024 | 1831 | 142.8 | +1.02 | +2.56 | 1.074 | 51.9% | -42 | -221 | -10 | 59.7% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.1 | -0.44 | 2015 | 1583 | 117.4 | -0.11 | -1.37 | 0.957 | 49.5% | +1 | -45 | — | 45.6% | -0.30 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–3 (0%) | 100.4 | +0.50 |
| 22 | 2025 | 1876 | 156.8 | +2.63 | +3.27 | 1.114 | 52.2% | -27 | -153 | -7 | 57.4% | +0.41 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 97.7 | -2.21 | 2016 | 1646 | 122.7 | +3.29 | -3.20 | 0.976 | 49.4% | -4 | -78 | -8 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.2 | -0.35 |
| 23 | 2026 | 1834 | 130.1 | +0.91 | +3.09 | 1.174 | 53.4% | -25 | — | +99 | 55.8% | +0.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.6 | +1.17 | 2017 | 1602 | 95.5 | -1.10 | -1.20 | 0.792 | 45.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1596 | 106.9 | +0.57 | +0.53 | 0.785 | 45.3% | -6 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.15 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1658 | 119.7 | +0.76 | -1.59 | 0.922 | 48.6% | -69 | +3 | -16 | 50.0% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -1.03 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1647 | 124.1 | +2.54 | -0.84 | 1.162 | 51.8% | -15 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1566 | 109.4 | -0.41 | -3.05 | 0.906 | 48.0% | +7 | +39 | — | 34.2% | -0.76 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | +0.82 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1691 | 113.4 | -0.02 | -1.40 | 0.944 | 49.3% | -36 | — | — | 47.4% | -0.58 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | -0.07 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1606 | 124.0 | -0.63 | -1.56 | 0.967 | 49.4% | +15 | +85 | — | 41.2% | -0.39 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–6 (14%) | 88.8 | -0.94 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1545 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1653 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1557 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1950 | 150.9 | +1.66 | +2.25 | 1.102 | 52.0% | -22 | -160 | -9 | 58.0% | +0.56 | 15–24 (38%) | 22–18 (55%) | 97.0 | -0.39 | — | 1743 | 121.9 | +0.93 | -1.96 | 0.963 | 49.2% | -2 | -4 | -11 | 44.4% | -0.36 | 26–28 (48%) | 15–22 (41%) | 98.5 | -0.75 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Anna-Lena Friedsam
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 25, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 7, 2020 | H2H |
| Margarita Gasparyan | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Kiki Bertens | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 28, 2019 | H2H |