H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Emma Raducanu vs Daria Saville H2H: 0-1
Daria Saville holds a 1–0 lead over Emma Raducanu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daria Saville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2022 Guadalajara third round 5-7 7-6(4) 4-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 23
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2022* | Guadalajara | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Daria Saville | 5-7 7-6(4) 4-3 (ret.) | Emma Raducanu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | #38 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,950 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,723 | 1 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 1 | 1 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,751 | 1 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,835 | 1 | 1 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #38 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |