H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emma Raducanu vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 1-0

Emma Raducanu holds a 1–0 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Raducanu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Raducanu won the 2022 Cincinnati Open second round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emma Raducanu
Great Britain Age 23 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emma Raducanu #13 6-0 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #22 Match data Aug 18, 2022* R32 Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emma Raducanu #70 #10 2,975 1,949 90 72 55.6% 1 0 0 0 0 1
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emma Raducanu Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0
18 2021 12–6 66.7% #19 1,724 1 1 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0
19 2022 16–18 47.1% #78 1,733 1 1 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3
20 2023 5–5 50.0% #298 1,752 1 1 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5
21 2024 19–13 59.4% #56 1,830 1 1 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8
22 2025 27–21 56.2% #29 1,875 1 1 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14
23 2026 11–9 55.0% #70 1,834 1 1 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17
24 — — — — — — — 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17
25 — — — — — — — 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17
26 — — — — — — — 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20
27 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20
28 — — — — — — — 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20
29 — — — — — — — 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20
30 — — — — — — — 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21
31 — — — — — — — 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21
32 — — — — — — — 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21
34 — — — — — — — 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emma Raducanu Victoria Azarenka
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 2021 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2022 10 12 22 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
20 2023 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
21 2024 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
22 2025 17 15 32 53.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — —
23 2026 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 57 49 106 53.8% 13 13 26 50.0% 20 10 30 66.7% — — — — — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/164 of Emma Raducanu's and 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emma Raducanu Victoria Azarenka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3%
18 2021 18/18 2.9 3.1 68.5% 69.9% 43.1% 58.9% 38.2% 61.2% 45.6% 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5%
19 2022 34/34 2.9 3.2 67.8% 63.1% 47.4% 53.4% 53.1% 58.1% 44.8% 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5%
20 2023 10/11 2.2 2.1 62.8% 65.7% 49.3% 53.4% 33.3% 59.2% 41.0% 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1%
21 2024 31/32 3.5 3.4 64.5% 63.7% 46.5% 63.3% 51.1% 57.7% 45.4% 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6%
22 2025 39/48 3.5 2.8 65.8% 65.3% 47.0% 58.2% 51.8% 59.1% 45.6% 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6%
23 2026 18/21 1.4 2.9 66.5% 62.4% 48.1% 51.6% 59.7% 58.2% 49.0% 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1%
Career — 150/163 3.0 3.0 66.2% 64.7% 46.8% 57.1% 50.1% 58.7% 45.5% — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emma Raducanu Victoria Azarenka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21
18 2021 1725 136.6 +2.85 +1.24 1.176 53.0% -9 — -66 69.4% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.59 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30
19 2022 1733 139.2 +0.89 +1.65 1.068 51.5% -16 -140 -90 54.3% +0.66 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 98.0 +0.76 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25
20 2023 1752 128.8 +1.74 -0.36 1.004 49.6% +1 — — 52.4% +0.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.50 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88
21 2024 1831 142.8 +1.02 +2.56 1.074 51.9% -42 -221 -10 59.7% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 -0.44 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87
22 2025 1876 156.7 +2.63 +3.27 1.114 52.2% -27 -153 -7 57.4% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 97.7 -2.19 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63
23 2026 1834 130.1 +0.91 +3.09 1.174 53.4% -26 — +100 55.8% +0.40 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 +1.17 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03
Career — 1949 150.8 +1.66 +2.25 1.102 52.0% -22 -160 -8 58.0% +0.56 15–24 (38%) 22–18 (55%) 97.0 -0.38 — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.