H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eugenie Bouchard vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 2-1
Eugenie Bouchard holds a 2–1 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Eugenie Bouchard leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2014 WTA Finals round-robin match 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2014 | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 6-3 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Eugenie Bouchard | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Eugenie Bouchard | 6-3 6-3 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eugenie Bouchard | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |