H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Eugenie Bouchard vs Patricia Maria Tig H2H: 0-1
Patricia Maria Tig holds a 1–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Maria Tig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Maria Tig won the 2020 Istanbul final 2-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2020* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Patricia Maria Tig | 2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eugenie Bouchard | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |