H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Eugenie Bouchard vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 0-2
Roberta Vinci holds a 2–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2015 US Open fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | (w/o) | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2015* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 6-1 6-0 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eugenie Bouchard | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |