Eva Lys
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Linda Noskova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Panna Udvardy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Eva Lys vs Laura Siegemund
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Eva Lys vs Laura Siegemund.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 7-5 6-1 | Eva Lys | Match data | Mar 20, 2023 | Q2 | Miami Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Lys | #98 | #39 | 1,303 | 1,884 | 45 | 48 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Siegemund | #102 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,852 | 145 | 154 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Lys | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #136 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #131 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #51 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #125 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Lys | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| Career | — | 29 | 24 | 53 | 54.7% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | 66 | 83 | 149 | 44.3% | 69 | 56 | 125 | 55.2% | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 86/93 of Eva Lys's and 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Eva Lys | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2022 | 5/5 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 67.7% | 53.3% | 41.6% | 24.2% | 46.3% | 48.9% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 15/15 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 71.8% | 56.9% | 43.0% | 51.8% | 48.3% | 52.8% | 48.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 16/16 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 65.2% | 56.3% | 47.2% | 38.3% | 46.2% | 52.9% | 43.7% | 2010 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 73.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 12.5% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 47.5% |
| 23 | 2025 | 32/39 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 68.0% | 59.9% | 44.8% | 50.4% | 55.4% | 55.2% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 18/18 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 67.0% | 57.7% | 37.3% | 43.7% | 47.2% | 50.8% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 63.6% | 61.4% | 44.0% | 61.0% | 54.8% | 55.3% | 49.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8/12 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 70.8% | 58.6% | 50.3% | 47.6% | 51.3% | 55.8% | 47.8% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 43/48 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 71.0% | 59.9% | 46.9% | 51.7% | 50.6% | 56.1% | 46.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 24/25 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 69.0% | 58.7% | 42.8% | 57.5% | 45.1% | 53.7% | 46.8% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19/20 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 66.0% | 59.6% | 47.9% | 49.6% | 54.3% | 55.6% | 45.3% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 35/35 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 68.9% | 59.9% | 48.7% | 53.5% | 42.0% | 56.5% | 41.2% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 19/19 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 68.5% | 61.3% | 46.8% | 52.7% | 43.6% | 56.7% | 43.5% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20/22 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 70.1% | 56.1% | 49.0% | 51.7% | 47.4% | 53.9% | 40.6% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 70.1% | 58.4% | 45.6% | 50.7% | 39.2% | 54.8% | 37.6% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23/24 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 75.3% | 62.5% | 44.7% | 59.6% | 49.4% | 58.0% | 42.5% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 32/34 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 73.1% | 56.6% | 44.4% | 51.6% | 50.4% | 53.3% | 47.1% |
| 37 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 21/28 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 74.1% | 60.5% | 42.3% | 54.9% | 43.0% | 55.6% | 44.3% |
| 38 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19/20 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 75.0% | 59.2% | 46.8% | 52.5% | 41.4% | 56.1% | 42.3% |
| Career | — | 86/93 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 67.9% | 57.9% | 43.2% | 45.5% | 50.2% | 53.1% | 44.4% | — | 277/301 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 71.0% | 59.3% | 46.1% | 53.1% | 46.9% | 55.4% | 44.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Lys | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2021 | 1461 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1544 | 107.1 | -1.64 | -0.24 | 0.867 | 46.6% | — | +49 | — | 41.7% | -1.08 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1680 | 133.1 | -2.86 | +1.55 | 1.022 | 50.5% | -30 | -31 | — | 59.4% | +0.63 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 1729 | 125.2 | -2.25 | -0.04 | 0.927 | 48.2% | -39 | -11 | — | 59.4% | +0.31 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–0 (100%) | — | -0.72 | 2010 | 1483 | 96.8 | -2.49 | -3.75 | 0.712 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 2025 | 1855 | 146.2 | -1.33 | +2.17 | 1.006 | 50.3% | +8 | -125 | -260 | 50.6% | +0.27 | 8–3 (73%) | 0–4 (0%) | 104.3 | -0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 1726 | 115.8 | -3.24 | -0.47 | 0.828 | 46.1% | +26 | -39 | -125 | 34.9% | -1.23 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–2 (33%) | 94.8 | -1.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1495 | 114.5 | +1.56 | +0.48 | 1.094 | 52.5% | — | +47 | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.44 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1530 | 113.4 | -1.13 | +2.65 | 1.082 | 51.4% | +25 | 0 | — | 44.0% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.0 | -0.28 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1747 | 132.7 | +0.58 | +2.35 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -100 | +75 | -189 | 56.9% | +0.36 | 11–4 (73%) | 3–5 (38%) | 106.8 | -0.49 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1796 | 129.1 | -1.81 | +3.46 | 1.011 | 50.2% | -247 | +119 | — | 53.3% | +0.10 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 94.0 | -1.87 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1693 | 118.6 | -0.34 | +1.50 | 1.020 | 50.5% | -147 | +85 | — | 48.7% | +0.23 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -1.08 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1667 | 125.7 | +0.15 | -0.92 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -73 | +57 | — | 43.2% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.0 | -0.71 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1789 | 142.4 | +0.10 | +1.20 | 1.003 | 50.0% | -78 | +22 | — | 52.3% | +0.30 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -1.05 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1732 | 132.3 | -1.05 | -1.02 | 0.881 | 47.5% | +5 | +47 | -144 | 40.4% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | -0.72 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1655 | 117.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.831 | 46.6% | +18 | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.75 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1801 | 135.1 | +1.10 | -0.24 | 1.012 | 50.5% | +3 | — | — | 53.4% | +0.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.31 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1740 | 133.5 | -2.46 | +2.44 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +19 | -18 | — | 53.2% | +0.16 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -0.05 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1804 | 133.6 | -0.54 | +1.20 | 0.998 | 49.8% | -13 | -162 | -31 | 49.2% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.8 | -0.32 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1749 | 132.0 | +0.15 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -22 | -29 | -39 | 42.9% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.9 | -0.22 |
| Career | — | 1885 | 135.9 | -2.19 | +0.96 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -6 | -43 | -183 | 49.5% | -0.06 | 15–15 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 100.7 | -2.39 | — | 1852 | 137.5 | -0.42 | +1.03 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -45 | +46 | -90 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 55–51 (52%) | 30–46 (39%) | 95.4 | -2.76 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Laura Siegemund
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 26, 2026 | H2H |