H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Fiona Ferro vs Mona Barthel H2H: 1-1
Fiona Ferro and Mona Barthel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fiona Ferro leads 1–0 on clay, while Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fiona Ferro won the 2019 Lausanne third round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Fiona Ferro | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Jan 31, 2019* | Hua Hin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | Fiona Ferro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiona Ferro | #189 | #39 | 1,649 | 1,799 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fiona Ferro | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #42 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #411 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |