H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Na Li H2H: 2-4

Na Li holds a 4–2 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2012 Beijing second round 6-2 6-3.

ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #8 6-2 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #33 Match data
Jun 4, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Na Li #7 6-4 7-6(0) Francesca Schiavone #5 Match data
May 29, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Francesca Schiavone #17 6-4 6-2 Na Li #12 Match data
Sep 8, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Na Li #19 6-2 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #28 Match data
Sep 25, 2008* Beijing WTA 500 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #23 6-1 7-6(4) Na Li #29 Match data
Jan 11, 2007* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Na Li #21 6-4 7-5 Francesca Schiavone #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8