H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francesca Schiavone vs Vesna Dolonc H2H: 2-0
Francesca Schiavone holds a 2–0 lead over Vesna Dolonc in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2011 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 6-1 6-2 | Vesna Dolonc | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Francesca Schiavone | 6-0 6-0 | Vesna Dolonc | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Vesna Dolonc | #603 | #84 | 788 | 1,579 | 23 | 40 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francesca Schiavone | Vesna Dolonc | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |