H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gisela Dulko vs Amy Frazier H2H: 0-1

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2006 Cincinnati Open round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #56 6-3 6-1 Gisela Dulko #33 Match data Jul 21, 2006* R16 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gisela Dulko Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2
19 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3
20 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3
21 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5
23 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5
24 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5
25 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gisela Dulko Amy Frazier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
19 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
21 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gisela Dulko Amy Frazier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73
16 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67
17 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37
18 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08
19 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93
20 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29
21 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10
22 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40
23 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72
24 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18
25 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87
26 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53
27 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09
Career — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02 — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.