H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gisela Dulko vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-2

Catalina Castano holds a 2–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2006 Italian Open round of 64 6-3 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catalina Castano #37 6-3 7-6(0) Gisela Dulko #34 Match data May 17, 2006* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Catalina Castano #65 6-3 6-0 Gisela Dulko #33 Match data Sep 30, 2005* R16 Korea Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Catalina Castano #1,073 #35 623 1,702 83 110 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gisela Dulko Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,518 0 0
24 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4 2007 10–20 33.3% #112 1,507 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,496 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,469 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,499 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,514 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,510 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,489 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gisela Dulko Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 5 13 18 27.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 26 45 71 36.6% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's and 80/171 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gisela Dulko Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0% 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9% 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3% 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8% 2007 22/30 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
Career — 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3% — 80/193 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gisela Dulko Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 2007 1508 109.0 -1.79 -1.74 0.883 47.1% -38 +186 — 34.8% -1.20 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.34
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1496 111.9 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% -7 +104 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.03
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1469 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1500 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +86 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.58
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1514 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +93 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1511 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1489 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.12
Career — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02 — 1702 117.4 -1.56 -1.33 0.901 47.8% -38 +97 -90 44.4% -0.42 32–39 (45%) 21–21 (50%) 96.8 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.