H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 0-4
Eleni Daniilidou holds a 4–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Eleni Daniilidou leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2007 Toronto second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2007 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-2 6-3 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Eleni Daniilidou | 5-7 6-3 8-6 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2006* | 's-Hertogenbosch | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-3 6-3 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2004* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-2 6-2 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |