H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Fabiola Zuluaga H2H: 1-1
Gisela Dulko and Fabiola Zuluaga are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 1–0 on clay, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2005 Los Angeles second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2005* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-3 6-3 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2003* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-1 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |