H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Gala Leon Garcia H2H: 0-1
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Gala Leon Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |