H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Henrieta Nagyova H2H: 2-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 2–0 lead over Henrieta Nagyova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gisela Dulko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2003 Budapest third round 5-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2003* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2003* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 5-1 (ret.) | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 |