H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2011 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 6-3 6-4 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gisela Dulko | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |