H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Ditty in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2008 Indian Wells Open round of 128 0-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | 0-6 6-3 6-3 | Julie Ditty | Match data | Mar 14, 2008* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,797 | 192 | 181 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Julie Ditty | #674 | #89 | 620 | 1,545 | 10 | 28 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Julie Ditty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,651 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #101 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #113 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #310 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Julie Ditty | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 95 | 107 | 202 | 47.0% | 81 | 58 | 139 | 58.3% | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Julie Ditty | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1488 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 1528 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +54 | — | 46.7% | +0.27 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 1516 | 103.4 | -0.14 | -1.46 | 0.874 | 47.6% | -8 | +76 | — | 36.0% | -0.44 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | 99.3 | +0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1706 | 135.1 | +1.79 | -0.44 | 1.017 | 50.3% | -27 | -95 | -100 | 52.9% | -0.25 | 3–4 (43%) | 9–1 (90%) | 106.2 | -0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 1725 | 129.6 | -1.55 | +1.29 | 0.994 | 49.6% | -23 | -48 | -80 | 55.8% | +0.32 | 11–8 (58%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.8 | +0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 1574 | 115.8 | -2.53 | -1.31 | 0.898 | 47.8% | +11 | +73 | +112 | 44.0% | -0.75 | 3–5 (38%) | 7–5 (58%) | 98.0 | +1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 1699 | 129.5 | -2.86 | -0.86 | 0.906 | 47.9% | +7 | -19 | — | 53.8% | +0.26 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–3 (67%) | 104.8 | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 1630 | 120.3 | -0.30 | -0.40 | 0.950 | 49.0% | -74 | +137 | +31 | 46.3% | -0.11 | 7–3 (70%) | 4–6 (40%) | 103.7 | -1.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 1731 | 135.0 | +0.97 | +0.64 | 1.040 | 50.8% | -69 | +46 | -30 | 55.7% | +0.42 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.2 | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 1687 | 136.7 | -0.13 | +2.36 | 1.028 | 50.5% | -9 | +74 | — | 49.5% | -0.11 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–9 (31%) | 96.3 | -1.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 1652 | 134.5 | +0.74 | +1.84 | 1.047 | 50.8% | -36 | +153 | — | 51.6% | +0.16 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.6 | -0.48 | 2005 | 1486 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1606 | 102.0 | -2.95 | +0.27 | 0.715 | 41.8% | -21 | — | — | 15.4% | -2.54 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1536 | 113.8 | -4.26 | -2.89 | 0.612 | 38.7% | +45 | -56 | — | 46.7% | -0.67 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | 0.00 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1445 | 97.9 | -3.05 | -4.28 | 0.785 | 44.9% | +67 | -15 | — | 20.0% | -2.07 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.4 | +0.46 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1439 | 101.6 | -0.49 | -1.93 | 0.854 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.04 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1435 | 101.7 | +1.63 | -1.30 | 0.736 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1421 | 93.2 | -3.52 | +0.55 | 0.472 | 35.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| Career | — | 1798 | 133.1 | -0.56 | +0.42 | 0.974 | 49.4% | -23 | +50 | -10 | 50.4% | -0.03 | 54–43 (56%) | 44–40 (52%) | 107.2 | +0.02 | — | 1545 | 103.7 | -2.62 | -3.42 | 0.754 | 44.0% | +58 | -38 | — | 28.6% | -1.61 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–6 (25%) | 97.9 | +1.03 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iveta Benesova | 2 | 6 | 8 | May 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 1, 2011 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 10, 2011 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 26, 2010 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 14, 2010 | H2H |
| Melinda Czink | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 31, 2008 | H2H |
| Timea Bacsinszky | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 25, 2008 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |
| Lucie Hradecka | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 17, 2011 | H2H |