H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Karolina Sprem H2H: 0-1
Karolina Sprem holds a 1–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2004 Athens Olympics second round 7-6(6) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2004* | Athens Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Karolina Sprem | 7-6(6) 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,797 | 192 | 181 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,854 | 93 | 104 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Karolina Sprem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #18 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,651 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |