H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Kristina Brandi H2H: 2-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gisela Dulko leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2005 Miami second round 4-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Kristina Brandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 |