H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gisela Dulko vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-0

Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2005 Linz Open round of 32 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gisela Dulko #30 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-2 Lisa Raymond #88 Match data Oct 27, 2005* R32 Linz Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gisela Dulko Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0
19 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0
20 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0
22 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1
23 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1
24 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1
25 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gisela Dulko Lisa Raymond
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gisela Dulko Lisa Raymond
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
16 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
17 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30
18 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38
19 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84
20 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10
21 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56
22 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87
23 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65
24 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54
25 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50
26 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19
27 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
Career — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02 — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.