H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Mariana Diaz-Oliva H2H: 1-2
Mariana Diaz-Oliva holds a 2–1 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mariana Diaz-Oliva leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2006 's-Hertogenbosch third round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006* | 's-Hertogenbosch | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Gisela Dulko | 6-1 7-6(3) | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |