H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gisela Dulko vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-1

Gisela Dulko and Mary Pierce are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2004 San Diego round of 32 6-3 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gisela Dulko #52 6-3 7-6(1) Mary Pierce #26 Match data Jul 29, 2004* R32 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Mary Pierce #34 6-1 6-4 Gisela Dulko #67 Match data May 12, 2004* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gisela Dulko Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4
18 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5
20 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7
21 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7
22 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8
23 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12
24 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15
26 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15
28 — — — — — — — 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 — — — — — — — 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16
30 — — — — — — — 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gisela Dulko Mary Pierce
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0%
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
19 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6%
20 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3%
24 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gisela Dulko Mary Pierce
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17
16 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05
17 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22
18 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14
19 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50
20 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10
21 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43
22 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07
23 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64
24 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22
25 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29
26 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21
27 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83
Career — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02 — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.