H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 2-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 2–0 lead over Mathilde Johansson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gisela Dulko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2010 Bogota third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2010* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 6-4 6-4 | Mathilde Johansson | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2009* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 6-1 6-2 | Mathilde Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Mathilde Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |